
Suddenly oil, eo ipso, is being rather blunt about things. It’s sticking a stake in the Middle Eastern sands, flipping the bird at (or is it sticking a fork in?) the latest iteration of Ozymandianism, fossil-foolery:
‘This is where I need to be. If you won’t discover my price, I’ll discover it on my own. My truth promises to be ugly. How ugly? I plan to dot our beautiful blue seas with pregnant tankers.’
And so oil is mounting its escape from the Wall Street Penal Colony, the bars of which are fashioned from the blackest pig-iron hubris.
Further behind in the escape-tunnel is gold. Its time is coming too. The physical is already speaking up for itself, demanding a price that bears no resemblance to the cartel proxies. LBMA and COMEX are floundering OPECs in their own right.
Of course gold’s discovery (de-alienation) process, as denoted –for the moment and of necessity– in currency, is inherently more ‘detainable’; compounding things further, gold is in the grips of its own transition drama, as it departs the sui generis commodity grouping to re-claim its unique historical role as monetary metal.
So make room at the table. In the final analysis real things are gluttons for real space. Keystrokes can no more banish the real as summon it. Clearly the real is getting ornery and wearies of being overlooked by a bunch of silly electrons.
Eric Peters by way of Zero Hedge this weekend called out the fraying prescriptive remedy of endless and ephemeral storage: “…credit a column, change a ledger, hit a button, hire the Blackrock boys. Add a server, maybe two. That’s the Fed’s storage cost.”
As youtuber Belangp notes, even gold may be experiencing storage/capacity issues of its own as the deteriorating gold-lending business, victim of negative interest rates, bids for constrained vault space as evidenced by exaggerated carry rates at front-end contracts.
Interesting parallel. All of a sudden the metrics of volume are back in the news.

Truth, while irrepressible in the long run, is often destructive towards the tissues of prevailing lies. Normally, a Truth Reconciliation movement deserves our unabashed applause. It should be no less so for resumed price discovery, a critical mechanism for planetary resource allocation.
Except in this instance, we are all implicated –by way of pension plans and 401ks and such– in the levitational excesses.
The OPEC weak sisters have all grown into the comfortable lifestyles paper oil afforded them. Nigeria, Tunisia, Algeria, Venezuela; these nations are unrecognizable without plumped-up oil. How will they possibly survive?
This brings us to one of the more indispensable essays of the last few years (2018) where Alistair Crooke (channeling Chris Cook) zeroes in on the “more US power, less empire” re-calibration inherent in Trump’s Energy Dominance doctrine, a doctrine which cannot possibly survive commodity truth-reconciliation.
This doctrine was born of pure shimmering hubris as it sought to build atop the pre-existent petrodollar form a superstructure of such towering, Babelian ‘managerialism’ that authentic supply/demand signals would forever languish in a state of permanent estrangement. Welcome to the will-to-power complex of enforced alienation.
Oil would become the in-house poker chip. Wall Street would become the jealous casino. As for oil’s use-value (checkers-playing plebes can be excused for thinking unabashed utility was the reason for sending their kids to war; in fact, all wars are bankers wars), it would become a tertiary and manipulable orphan subject to the geopolitical whims of the banking class.
An extended except is warranted:
“It seems, as Chris Cook explains, that Gary Cohn, then chief economic adviser to the President had a part in the genesis to this ambition. Cohn (then at Goldman Sachs), together with a colleague from Morgan Stanley, conceived of a plan in 2000 to take control of the global oil trading market through an electronic trading platform, based in New York. In brief, the big banks, attracted huge quantities of ‘managed money’ (from such as hedge funds), to the market, to bet on future prices (without their ever actually taking delivery of crude: trading ‘paper oil’, rather than physical oil). And, at the same time, these banks worked in collusion with the major oil producers (including later, Saudi Arabia) to pre-purchase physical oil in such a way that, by withholding, or releasing physical crude from, or onto the market, the big NY banks were able to ‘influence’ the prices (by creating a shortage, or a glut).
To give some idea of the capacity of these bankers to ‘influence’ price, by mid – 2008, it was estimated that some $260 billion of ‘managed’ (speculative) investment money was in play in energy markets, completely dwarfing the value of the oil actually coming out of the North Sea each month, at maybe $4 to $5 billion, at most. These ‘paper’ oil-option plays would therefore often trump the ‘fundamentals’ of real supply, and real end-user demand.
‘Step one’ for Cohn, was therefore, for the US to manage the trading market, both in price and access – with U.S. antagonists such as Iran or Russia, being able to access the market on inferior terms, if at all. The putative ‘step two’, has been to nurse US shale production, build new American LNG export terminals, and open America to further oil and gas exploration, whilst strong-arming everyone from Germany to South Korea and China, to buy American LNG exports. And ‘thirdly’, with Gulf oil exports already under the US umbrella, there were then, two major Middle East energy producers beyond the boundaries of cartel ‘influence’ (falling more into rival Russia’s strategic energy-producing ‘heartland’): Iran – which is now the subject of regime change–style, economic siege on its oil exports, and Iraq, which is subject of intense (soft) political pressures (such as threatening to sanction Iraq under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act) to force its adherence to the western sphere.
What would this Trump notion of energy dominance mean in simple language? The US – were energy dominance to succeed – simply would control the tap to the economic development – or its lack thereof – for rivals China, and Asia. And the US could squeeze Russia’s revenues in this way, too. In short, the US could put a tourniquet on China’s and Russia’s economic development plans. Is this why JCPOA was revoked by President Trump?
Here then, is the squaring of that circle (more US power, yet less empire): Trump’s US aims for ‘domination’, not through the globalists’ permanent infrastructure of the US defence umbrella, but through the smart leveraging of the US dollar and financial clearing monopoly, by ring-fencing, and holding tight, US technology, and by dominating the energy market, which in turn represents the on/off valve to economic growth for US rivals. In this way, Trump can ‘bring the troops home’, and yet America keeps its hegemony. Military conflict becomes a last resort.”
Since 1971-73, this transportive disease, financialization has spread like a virus, inflicting the imaginarium-for-profit paradigm upon our terra-firma walkaboutness.
Now the cure is arriving on the heels of a virus. The pain will be widely-felt. However the aftermath, provided we survive the cure, will be a world that can be held, touched and transacted-upon once again.